Score your AI-DLC maturity
A short, self-scoring read of how your engineering org actually ships with AI today. It’s the same lens we use to scope a first engagement.
How to read it
Score each capability honestly, from “blind in production” to “mature”. It’s a mirror, not a benchmark to game. The value is in seeing where the gaps actually are.
The dimensions map onto the questions we ask on a first call and onto the pre-registered gate, so the diagnostic already previews how an engagement would be scoped and measured.
The maturity diagnostic
Score each capability below. Nothing is sent anywhere. It runs entirely in your browser.
Lifecycle
Are changes captured as clear, implementation-neutral intent that people and AI can both act on?
How systematically is AI used to generate and modify production code?
Is AI used to generate, maintain, and strengthen tests?
Enablers
Has the process adapted to AI, or just bolted it on?
Are there guardrails for AI-generated work before it ships?
Can the org measure delivery well enough to prove what works?
Is leadership aligned and willing to fund real change?
Architecture AI-readiness
Are components separated by clear interfaces that bound the blast radius of a change?
Can the system validate changes automatically: types, contracts, tests?
Your profile
Score a dimension above to see your maturity profile and where to focus.
Your answers stay in your browser. Nothing is sent anywhere.
Want a deeper read?
A fixed-fee diagnostic turns this self-score into a baselined, measured starting point.